Macdara Woods::

REMEMBERING PATRICK KAVANAGH IN 2004: AT THE KAVANAGH SEAT BY THE GRAND CANAL, St PATRICK'S DAY




In March 1964 I was sitting in MacDaid's, on my way to Spain with Laetitia Mary Julia Martin, 
my subsequent wife, and saw Brendan Behan for the last time: when I reached the Poste Restante 
in Seville some ten or twelve days later, there was a letter from my mother telling me he had died. 

Forty years and a few months ago, in winter, I remember sitting in a pub in Soho, around the corner 
from Martin Greene's flat, with Kavanagh and Katherine, and Dickie Riordan, in the glow of the 
imminent appearance of the Collected Poems.

And now it's 2004, Kavanagh's 100th birthday. Thirty-seven years since he died, and I sometimes 
wonder at our yearly gathering - it's not a particularly publicised event, no photo opportunities 
of the celebrity kind like church doors at funerals. 

Which is not to say there haven't been Kodak moments. There have by the hundred, each one a part 
of the fabric and memory of someone's life.

David Devitt showed me recently a photograph taken here, sometime in the seventies I suppose it 
must have been. John Jordan, standing for some reason on the other side of the bench here, 
Mr Bratt, the Swedish ambassador, identified triumphantly by John as "Queen Christina's personal 
emissary to me". And there was Katherine, with a black wing of hair across her forehead, 
and Dickie, and Leland, and Ann O' Neill and Christy O' Neill, all in suspension in the 
improbable sunshine of a semi-tropical March in some eternal decade of an unending century.

Memories of what one person says to another, of things John Jordan said - the astonishment on 
occasion of his very presence, maybe one or two things I've said, poems of Kavanagh's that got 
read. Music that was played. Liam Brady, for instance, with whom I am still making an epic 
journey to Scotstown in 1970, who is a monument to God because he too lives in the eternal 
present tense.  Which is where I would hope to end my days, like Rilke's Angel, making no 
distinction between the living and the dead.

Certainly where Kavanagh lived. Maybe that's why he could invoke, so unembarrasSedly, the 
eternal. Why he could speak without coy apology about The Poet, and Poetry, and without 
affectation, or delusion, of 
 making his grove here on this urban stretch of canal bank beside this city bridge. It wasn't 
 just the lung cancer, and the operation, and the convalescence, the near brush with death. 
 The truth is he was always ready, even before any of those accidentals, to be outrageously 
 ambushed by life. 
                           Where by a lock niagarously roars
                           The falls for those who sit in the tremendous silence
                            Of mid-July.

That perspective, an illumination waiting to happen in the perfection of that tremendous silence, 
when the interior and exterior worlds collide. Where the everyday now and the eternal now meet. 
As they do, somewhere, every day of the week; as the notorious stopped clock is right twice a 
day; the trick for the poet is to be there, and to know that you are.

A hundred years is a long time, thirty-seven years is a long time, and sixty-four is another 
long time, or certainly was as Kavanagh lived it. 
And before going any further, I must make a personal acknowledgement to Kavanagh, pay a 
personal debt as it were, for myself and also for my immediate contemporaries, living and 
dead.  We had a version of the metaphorical privilege of sheltering from the rain for a while, 
in a doorway, with a great man, and for the past 37 years I have never forgotten it. I am glad 
to see that Amy Mims is here today, the heroic translator of the Great Hunger into Greek. In 
the Introduction I wrote for that book, in 1999, I stated my personal debt: 
      
 "There was another outbreak of literary activity in Dublin at the beginning of the sixties, 
 with two new magazines, Poetry Ireland and Arena. Kavanagh published in both of these, to 
 good effect, his continued record of a soul. He read and acknowledged the work of young 
 writers, myself among them, and he was a visible accessible presence, the human expression 
 of his own aesthetic. He was the single most significant influence on me, personally and in 
 my work, and has remained - almost without my knowing it - both mentor and arbiter. Hardly a 
 day goes by that he doesn't come to mind, that I do not find myself wondering in different 
 situations what would Kavanagh have made of this?  Nor, I know, am I the only one, because 
 at its simplest, for me, and my generation, he was so patently the real thing…. (He could be) 
 sharp and generous in the same breath, (had) the gambler's peculiar gift for wrong-headedness, 
 made enthusiastic sweeping statements, the only kind of statement, he said, worth listening to, 
 and spoke authentically of love." 

 Insights snatched out of time, "horrid-good outrageous insights" as they would say in the 
 Meath of my childhood, near enough his own word: a poem I first heard, recited by John Stephen 
 Moriarty, in the middle of Harcourt Street at the end of the fifties - 
                                    
                                                                                  the unnerved
               Crowds looking up with terror in their rational faces
               O dance with Kitty Stobling I outrageously 
               Cried out-of-sense to them, while their timorous paces
               Stumbled behind Jove's page-boy paging me.
               I had a very pleasant journey, thank you sincerely
               For giving me my madness back, or nearly.

In the Self Portrait he asserted that thirty years before Kitty Stobling, "Shancoduff's watery 
hills could have done the trick, but I was too thick to take the hint. Curious this, how I had 
started off with the right simplicity, indifferent to crude reason and then ploughed my way 
through complexities and anger, hatred and ill-will towards the faults of man, and come back 
to where I started…….But poetry has to do with the reality of the spirit, of faith and hope 
and sometimes even charity. It is a point of view. A poet is a theologian."

 "Immortality is not in the future, it is in the timeless now. A blossom is immortal within its 
 moment. A flash of summer sunlight is immortal. Moments of happiness, grief, or joy are 
 immortal. A man is immortal when his ideas are exciting to the young."  

He also asserted that the power of literature derived from its being concerned with things that 
were of no importance to newspapers or politicians. You are full of enthusiasm for the eternal 
verities, he said, and then out of sinful curiosity you open a newspaper. You are disillusioned 
and wrecked.

But plough his way he did, through complexities and anger, through satire and polemic, at full 
volume. And like all purgative katharsis - you miss it when you don't have it.

 And more than anything, we need today, in our global village, a theologian of the timeless now: 
 some deep engagement, not fashionable, pastiche or parody, not from the official, licensed 
 satirists, the chattering magazine-classes, but again an awkward angry Monaghan foghorn, who 
 believes in the possibility of faith, hope and charity. 

 As everyone from Barnum to Bailey, Lenin to Lawlor, Bush to Blair, Cullen to Campbell, 
 Noah to Neptune knows, if you tell a lie often enough, or better still print it, it becomes 
 a fact. A thing that troubles me deeply about our current and enthusiastic position on the 
 outskirts of the global village, is a refinement on this - the process by which language 
 becomes increasingly meaningless. Not an accident, I believe, but part of the spinning 
 acceleration of global brute-politik itself.

And when I'm listening at home to the radio of an afternoon, which I often do after I've eaten, 
because I still have this ludicrous delusion of wanting to know what's going on, it's at this 
point in the conversation that Joe Duffy moves in on the unwary phone caller: Oho, says he, 
It's a conspiracy, is that what you're saying? Are you saying there's a conspiracy? And of 
course everyone retreats into mass-sanity, into self-deprecation at once - Conspiracy? 
Good God, no. Certainly not.

But I always want to say Yes, that there is indeed a conspiracy afoot, a conspiracy of 
expedience, of acquiescence, of self-censorship, of good business sense, of so-called 
correctness, of dumbing down and intellectual disinvolvement, something like the conspiracy 
of the 38 genuinely decent people in Queens in New York, in 1964 as it happens, her 
neighbours, who watched Kitty Genovese being stabbed to death outside their windows, 
and didn't lift a finger to stop it. They didn't conspire, Joe, in the sense that they 
didn't plot it, but they did in the sense that they knowingly let it happen. 

The genesis of Cohen's First we take Manhattan, then we take Berlin.

And it is because of that so-called correctness and intellectual disinvolvement that I'm 
mentioning these matters in what is meant to be a celebratory speech for Patrick Kavanagh, 
on the canal bank by Baggot Street Bridge, The Rowley Mile: because I know that these are 
our contemporary versions of affairs and considerations that preoccupied him. The not giving 
up on truth. I heard someone ask on the BBC last Sunday in a similar context: Should art 
tackle these issues or leave well alone? Kavanagh's answer was, that Art is never art. 
What is called art is merely life.

In a piece written for Nonplus on Violence and Literature, Kavanagh wrote: "A lie is a 
terrifying business, looking so much more reasonable than the truth, for truth often takes 
time to make itself apparent. Nowadays, of course, at the outbreak of war, poets are drafted 
into what is called Information, one of their main jobs being the manufacture of 
 lies injurious to the enemy." Maybe so, in the last Great Patriotic War, when as Louis MacNeice 
 put it, Brother Fire was having his dog-day, but we have moved, beyond even 1984 and the 
 Ministry of Truth. The simple fact is, that for these last few years and more, language 
 seems increasingly to be - by the very collusion of the professional communicators - 
 without meaning or relevance.

The moral high ground enclosure is not a place I'd want to be, in a cloud of paranoia, with 
everyone in terror of being found out. And poets (if one may call oneself that) are as open 
as any to the human foibles. Kavanagh himself was no stranger to horse-trading. 

But consider this, a "coalition of the willing" for example, what other kind is there? What 
does it mean? A "compassionate conservatism", what does that mean? Or a sign straight out of 
1984 that I saw cut into the stone gate-pillars of a Marine troop-transport air-base in South 
Carolina last April: in two-foot-high lettering - The "Noise" in inverted commas, 'The "Noise" 
You Hear Is The Sound Of Freedom', or on the radio phone-in show in New York last December, 
a caller referring quite matter-of-factly to "those anti-freedom Liberals", and no-one demurred. 
Anti-freedom Liberal….how did language get to that?

The older I get, of an age when you think you might have some kind of a handle on things, the 
more I realise there's no grasp to be had, we live - as I overheard someone say recently - 
in a laboratory of catastrophe. But then I return to the man we are honouring here today - 

                  To be dead is to stop believing in
                  The masterpieces we will begin tomorrow


Where I began these notes it was forty years ago, 1964, and I was setting out for Spain with my 
proud green passport, fire green as grass, the marvellous Supremes were singing Baby Love, and 
Where Did Our Love Go, and Joan Baez was singing - My feet start going round, going round, 
going down the highway, my feet start going round, and I gotta go…

And Kavanagh was walking the streets of Dublin, a year younger than I am now, leaving a trail 
of bicarbonate of soda, exploring the comic, sometimes literally homeless, or - more correctly - 
between abodes, with one lung, in pain, alcoholic, adhering somehow, miraculously, to the 
spirit of his contention that Supreme Good Health Is The Essence Of Genius. And writing, 
and publishing in small magazines: this from Arena, in 1963:

Thank You, Thank You
Epilogue to a series of lectures given at University College Dublin

       …Don't grieve like Marcus Aurelius
       Who said that though he grew old and grey
       The people on the Appian Way
       Were always the same pleasant age
       Twenty-four on average…

        
       I thank you and I say how proud
       That I have been by fate allowed
       To stand here having the joyful chance
       To claim my own inheritance
       For most have died the day before
       The opening of that Holy Door.

What I have always known, and what I wish all others could realise, about Kavanagh's final 
years in Dublin, is the extent to which he was needed, and how much he was loved.

                                                                                 Macdara Woods
                                                                                 March 2004


This is an edited version of a speech given at the Grand Canal, Baggot Street Bridge, on 
St Patrick's Day, 17th March 2004.

<Back to MacDara Woods entry
Back to Patrick Kavanagh entry